Bitesize episode - A Review of Intermezzo by Sally Rooney and Kairos by Jenny Erpenbeck
The Story
A reflective exploration of Intermezzo and Kairos - the pause that gives the meaning and the moment that matters. In this solo episode, Christina shares insights on how timing and intervals shape our experiences.
Hello and welcome back to Books and Chat. I'm Christina and today I'm bringing you a special festive episode. Over the past two months, our Gloucester Book Club has been reading 2 very different novels, Intermezzo by Sally Rooney and Kai Ros by Jenny Erpenbeck. Both have sparked lively discussion and I thought I'd share my own reflections with you this afternoon. And since we're heading into December, let me start by wishing all of you a very happy Christmas. Whether you're listening with a mince pie in hand or just taking a quiet moment, I hope this episode feels like a friendly fireside chat.
Before we get into the discussion, let me give you a quick outline of Intimetzo. The novel follows two brothers in Ireland, Peter, a successful barrister battling inner demons, and Ivan, a socially awkward young chess prodigy. Both are coping with the recent death of their father, and Rooney explores how grief, relationships and silence shape their lives. Along the way, we see Peter struggles with addiction and a controversial relationship with a younger woman, while Ivan finds unexpected connection with an older partner.
It's a story about family, intimacy and the difficulty of making the right moves in life. One of the most debated aspects of Intermezzo in our club was Peter. Outwardly he's the successful barrister, polished, articulate and seemingly in control. But beneath that surface lies a man wrestling with inner demons. His dependence on alcohol and drugs unsettled many readers in our group, and the relationship with a much younger woman was, for some, uncomfortable to witness. It raised questions about power, vulnerability, and whether Rooney was critiquing or simply portraying these dynamics.
Peter is undeniably complex, and while some admired Rooney's willingness to show his flaws without judgement, others felt alienated by him. He's not an easy character to like, and perhaps that's the point. By contrast, Ivan seemed less complicated. He is socially awkward, much younger than Peter, and his relationship with an older woman felt to many of us more tender and mutually supportive. Yet, as several members pointed out, in small town Ireland, such a pairing would likely have provoked comment, and Rooney doesn't shy away from that tension.
She lets us imagine the whispers and the judgements that might surround them. For me, Ivan's storyline, character, quiet dignity, his chess world gave him structure, and his relationship seemed to offer him a kind of acceptance that Peter, despite his outward success, never quite found.
What struck me most was Ivan's chess world. Rooney uses the game as a metaphor for strategy, isolation, and the difficulty of making the right move in life. For me, Intermezzo was the stronger of the two books that we read. It's not flashy, but it lingers, and I found myself thinking about the brothers long after I closed the book. And isn't that the mark of a novel that works? And now, a short description of Kairos. Set in East Berlin during the days, it tells the story of Katerina, a young woman, and Hans, a much older man, who fall into an intense love affair.
At first, their relationship feels passionate and transformative, but over time it becomes coercive and abusive, reflecting the imbalance of power between them. When urban back intertwines that personal collapse with the political upheaval of the era. So the fall of the Berlin Wall mirrors the breakdown of their bond and their relationship. It's a novel about memory, history, and how private lives are inseparable from public events. Kairos is one of those novels that demands careful unpacking. At it's heart is the relationship between Hans, the much older man, and Katerina, a young woman just beginning to find her place in the world.
Many of us asked, what did Katerina find attractive about Hans at the start? He offers her intensity, intellectual stimulation and a sense of being seen. For a young woman, that kind of attention can feel intoxicating. The early chapters capture that first rush of love, the sense of possibility of being swept into something larger than yourself. But as the novel progresses, the relationship shifts. What begins as loving and passionate becomes coercive, controlling and ultimately abusive. Hans's dominance grows and Katerina's voice diminishes.
This was very hard for book club club members to read. Urbenbach doesn't soften the reality either. She shows how love can curdle into manipulation, and how difficult it is to disentangle yourself once you're caught up in that dynamic.
The allegorical dimension of Kairos adds another layer. The collapse of their relationship mirrors the fall of the Berlin Wall, and just as East Germany disintegrates, so too does the bond between Hans and Katarina.
So the novel suggests that private lives and public histories are inseparable. The personal is political and the political is personal. For me, this was one of the most powerful aspects of the book. So the title itself, Kairos, refers to the opportune moment, the time when everything changes. Urpinbeck asks us to consider whether Katarina and Hans ever truly had such a moment, or whether history itself swept them along. So how do these two novels sit side by side? Intermezzo is intimate, restrained, focused on family and inner lives, and Kairos is expansive and historical and concerned with how love and politics intertwine.
Both of them received mixed reviews in our book club, which I think is a good sign. Books that divide opinion often spark the richest conversations we find. What's fascinating is that both novels explore age gap relationships, though in very different contexts. So into Metso, Peter's relationship with a younger woman unsettled many of our readers, while Ivan's bond with an older woman seemed gentler but socially provocative in small town Ireland. In Kairos, the imbalance between Hans and Katarina becomes destructive, raising questions about power, consent and the vulnerability of youth.
Age gap relationships are not inherently problematic, but both novels show how they can magnify issues of control, perception and social judgement. Rooney and Urpinbeck use them to probe deeper questions. How do we navigate intimacy when the scales of power are uneven? And how do personal choices reflect or resist the societies we live in? For me, Intermezzo edged ahead. It felt more cohesive, more emotionally resident. But I'm also glad we read Kairos too. Together they remind us of the breadth of contemporary literature, from the quiet rooms of Irish families to the turbulent streets of Berlin.
So that brings us to the end of today's Books and Chat. Thank you for joining me for this reflective episode. Whether you agreed with our club's mixed views or found your own meaning in these novels, I hope this chat inspires you to keep reading widely and curiously. And before I go, let me share a little recommendation. Our club is currently reading The Land in Winter by Andrew Miller. It was shortlisted for the Booker Prize this year. Although it didn't win, I was really rooting for it. If you're looking for a winter read or perhaps a Christmas present for someone who loves historical fiction, I thoroughly recommend it.
I'll be back in January to talk more about it. As we wrap up the year, I want to wish you all a very happy Christmas. May your holidays be filled with warmth, good company and perhaps a few books under the tree. Until then, keep turning those pages and keep the chat alive. Goodbye for now.
Podbean